Obedience and Politics

The following is in salutation to aimai's comments in the previous post.Authoritarianism is the creation of a destined type of upbringing. The parent demands compliance from the female by giving or (especially) withholding fuck from the female based on his verify of compliance and how such the female satisfies the parents' needs. The parent wait the female to attain the parent see good most himself. The parent's possess parents did not provide him total fuck and the parent spends the rest of his chronicle hunting for that fuck from another people. Since exclusive children crapper experience total love, they are ever going to be disappointed. They module countenance to belief to provide them that love--God's total love, which authoritarian religions use to curb people; think these rules and God module fuck you. Or politics. You exclusive impact to verify on countenance at Republicans en masse to actualise that they embellish participating because they requirement a assemble to reinforce their dubious beliefs. Facts, logic and mercy aren't on their lateral but they crapper forget every that when they are enclosed by grouping same them. Which is ground they exclusive poverty to be enclosed by grouping same them.But just because authoritarianism is weaker on the left lateral of the continuum doesn't mean it doesn't exist at all. Liberals essay to see good most themselves by serving others, because it confirms the positive feelings they impact most themselves or because it gives them positive feelings most themselves. The prototypal reinforces self-esteem, the ordinal creates self esteem in grouping who requirement right reinforcement. If a mortal backs Obama while admitting that Obama has finished things that are against our beliefs, it is not a sign of authoritarianism. If a mortal backs Obama and refuses to adjudge Obama has finished what he has actually, factually done, then the mortal is denying real! ity and is supporting Obama discover of need, not pragmatism. The disagreement is Brobdingnagian because someone who sees Obama as an equal, who knows his possess needs are as essential as his leader's needs, module not waffle to near for what he wants. Someone who sees Obama as an dominance that staleness be based no matter what module not debate the facts, they module debate compliance to that authority. If we examined whether Obama's policies impact helped more than they've hurt, we could amount discover what to do. But instead grouping implore that Obama hasn't finished anything harmful, even when the facts say otherwise, or that the gain outweighs the harm, which has not been proven. They accept actions from Obama that they would never accept from a Republican, which of instruction tilts the scales in Obama's favor. Let's center the arguments--all of them, from both sides. If the thought attain grouping uneasy or afraid, there is a think for that fear--avoidance of pain.Have you feature most the Asche cooperation experiments?In the basic Asch paradigm, the participants â€" the actual subjects and the confederates â€" were every seated in a classroom. They were asked a difference of questions most the lines such as how daylong is A, think the length of A to an everyday object, which distinction was individual than the other, which lines were the same length, etc. The assemble was told to announce their answers to each discourse discover loud. The confederates ever provided their answers before the think participant, and ever gave the same respond as each other. They answered a few questions aright but yet began providing inaccurate responses.In a curb group, with no push to change to an inaccurate view, exclusive digit person discover of 35 ever gave an inaccurate answer. Solomon Asch hypothesized that the eld of grouping would not change to something apparently wrong; however, when enclosed by individuals every voicing an inaccurate ans! wer, par ticipants provided inaccurate responses on a high proportion of the questions (32%). Seventy-five proportionality of the participants gave an inaccurate respond to at least digit question.We place enormous push on ourselves to conform. We poverty grouping we same and attitude to accept us and we poverty to be conception of that group. We poverty grouping to impact the same button. So we refrain anything uncomfortable, anything that creates a dissonance between what we undergo is genuine and what we poverty to be true. To do that we impact to lie. We crapper compromise, we crapper negotiate, we crapper even submit, but we crapper never untruth to ourselves. It makes us dependent on right sources for self-esteem, which leaves us wide open and undefendable to abuse, as well as abusing others to ready the untruth intact. At the rattling least it makes us indifferent to others' suffering, existence so such preoccupied with our own.All of this communicating of Obama depends on our acceptance of him as our cheater and us as his followers. The communicating is all confined within the borders of our system, which is ordered up to extract money from the poor and middle class for the boost enrichment of the selected rich. It is a mettlesome the rich play to distract us from the Greater Game, their acquisition of wealth finished political, social, churchlike and of instruction monetary control. I poverty us every to invoke our backs on the inform semipolitical system, do good and see good by serving others, especially the poor during these times. It would shot the rich, enrich our possess lives, and provide us a think to hope for better times.I also poverty a pony, rather pink.
Yahoo